Confucianism, Daoism, Legalism.

A terra firma that used to be so bully crashed both politically and economically. To restore target and stability to this nation, there has to be a complete transformation of the whole government. In grade to grant that, there will be great sacrifices that will be made. If I have to choose one of Confucianism, Daoism, and Legalism as a governing system. The roughly effective system would be Legalism, because its stable, strict and steady. Which would led to a regent(postnominal) nation. The people of the nation would be abundanty devastated because of the disorder in their country.In order to have their luxurious lives back, they would make as much effort, to help with the recovery. Legalism would aim stability back to a devastated nation. For example, in the past Legalism brought back stability to China, after the warring states. There would be agricultural surpluses and people operative very hard on improving the cultivation. Second, the strict and harsh punishments wo uld final result in a decrease of crime rates. People would be shake up to act stupid and commit a crime. The severe punishments would be overflowing to stop most force out.Also, Legalism is about strengthening the military. A nation with a great army means an undefeatable, respected and a feared one. Other nations would be intimidated by how powerful the military is. It would be a strong nation, both politically and economically. Confucianism wouldnt be a good way of restoring order to a broken nation, but not a GREAT way. get fast is really important. I believe that Confucianism would take some while to do so. The whole system focuses on the improvement of each individuals morals.It would be hard to focus on each individual. Another reason is, Confucianism doesnt register anything about protecting the state. It says that to create an ideal government you need ripe(p) education and moral integrity. I agree with that, it doesnt mention anything about the military. Which I th ink is really important for a nation. Daoism would be the worst and to the lowest degree effective system. Daoism is very understandable of nature and the world. The systems motto would be less(prenominal) government the better.Disagreeing with that, I would say, without government there would constant violence and chaos. Thats the total opposite of what Daoism represents. There has to be limits for everything. Daoism also states that functional hard for something only leads to chaos. Actually, working hard for something is totally worth it. Especially, when there would be good results later on. Hard work always pays off. It would be a waste of time for everyone in the nation to devote their full time, caring about nature and the world. Instead, it would be better to build your nation through hard work.Honestly, other nations wouldnt take this system seriously. The system seems defenceless and easy to destroy. When you look at these three systems, Confucianism, Daoism, and Legal ism, one of them stands out the most. Legalism would be the fastest and most effective system to restore stability to a nation. Compared to Confucianism and Daoism, it would be very different and much stronger. If a nation follows the beliefs of Legalism, It would be strong, stable and strict. Eventually, it would result in a powerful and an undefeatable nation.